• follow us in feedly
Latest, Metro, News

CCT Resumes Justice Onnoghen’s Trial

By News desk

The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) on Monday resumed the trial of the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Walter Onnoghen who appeared alongside the parties in the suit.

The defence counsel Adeboyega Awomolo said that there are about five applications, which include the first filed on January 14, 2019, and the second on February 4, 2019.

He asked the tribunal to strike out the charge, while prayed for an adjustment to allow the National Judicial Council (NJC) to decide on the issues before the CJN can be tried.

In view of the fact that the petition that founded these charges are before NJC, Awomolo further asked the court to take judicial notice that the proceedings had begun before the NJC sitting.

The 3rd application was filed on January 31, 2019, in order to ensure fair hearing that the chairman should recuse himself or disqualify himself from the trial.

While the 4th application was filed on February 13, asking the tribunal to stay further proceedings and wait for the directive of the appeal court.

Counsel to accused, Awomolo said the last two applications have been overtaken by events, adding, the only two relevant ones are the application questioning jurisdiction of the tribunal

But the prosecutor, Aliyu Umar, said that in respect of the application challenging jurisdiction they filed a written address on January 16, 2019.

He added that he filed a counter affidavit in opposing the chairman and a second member of the Tribunal to recuse themselves from the trial.

Awomolo said in his argument of the appeal that by Combined reading of the constitution which established the tribunal, “It is a disciplinary court in other to enforce the obedient of the Code of Conduct of Public Officers, it has no penal jurisdiction. It cannot sentence or fine. All it can do according to paragraph 18 subsection 2 is to disqualify candidates etc.

“If you take a look at the disciplinary powers of NJC the constitution cannot donate the exercise of the same power to two bodies.

“The later provision overrides the former position.

“These positions have been established by the decision of this tribunal in the case of Justice Sylvester Nguta”.

Nwomolo urged the tribunal to maintain its position in the case of Nguta but the Prosecution counsel says it should be dismissed cos it lacked merit.

On the question of powers of the NJC as contrasted to the tribunal, he said it is a misconception of the Constitution and the Code of Conduct and Tribunal act.

“Tribunal cannot bring anybody before itself it is the CCB that makes that decision.

“The constitution directed the bureau to bring their complaints here not NJC. For the bureau to take its complaint to NJC will be minimal”.

He added that there is a difference between judicial misconduct and a breach of the code of conduct.

“Awomolo you can’t run from the fact that Justice ‘Nguta was brought to the tribunal based on misconduct.

“Allow the application to let him go to the NJC and get back if need be”.

On the second application by justice Onnoghen asking the tribunal chairman to recuse himself from the trial counsel to Justice Onnoghen argues that “A person is entitled to a fair hearing within a reasonable time.

“This application has two issues this proceeding is afflicted with a funder mental bias which raises a very serious constitutional issue.

“The accuser, the complainant, the prosecutor, and the judex, the investigator is in one arm of government. This is against the root of natural justice and the fundamental right of fair hearing deserves a thorough examination of the Tribunal”.

But the prosecutor argued “The composition of the Tribunal is as directed by the enabling act. The case of this tribunal constitution ensures that members are independent.

“The real complaint of the defendant in this matter is that this tribunal in the interim directed the defeat to step aside and directed the president to swear – in the most senior person as CJN. On this fundamental complain the defeat has appealed against that ruling.

He added that the defendant did not demonstrate any bias against the chairman or any member of the Tribunal.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.